典型文献
Comment on "Comparison of different versions of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients"
文献摘要：
Dear editor,
We have read with great interest the recent article "Comparison of different versions of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients: A retrospective observational study".[1] They showed that the performance of the procalcitonin-enhanced qSOFA (PqSOFA) was similar to that of the qSOFA, and the lactate-enhanced qSOFA (LqSOFA) and the modified qSOFA (MqSOFA) were superior to the qSOFA for predicting in-hospital mortality. Further, they suggested that the MqSOFA should be a candidate for the qSOFA in the emergency department (ED). We congratulate the authors for their contributions. However, we has several concerns about this research.
文献关键词：
中图分类号：
作者姓名：
Hang Dai;Ping Wang;Ji-mei Zhang;Li Luo
作者机构：
Department of Emergency Medicine,the Third People's Hospital of Chengdu,Chengdu 610031,China
文献出处：
引用格式：
[1]Hang Dai;Ping Wang;Ji-mei Zhang;Li Luo-.Comment on "Comparison of different versions of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients")[J].世界急诊医学杂志（英文）,2022(02):160
A类：
PqSOFA,LqSOFA,MqSOFA,congratulate
B类：
Comment,Comparison,different,versions,quick,sequential,organ,failure,assessment,predicting,hospital,mortality,sepsis,patients,Dear,editor,
We,have,read,great,interest,recent,article,retrospective,observational,study,They,showed,that,performance,procalcitonin,enhanced,was,similar,lactate,modified,were,superior,Further,they,suggested,should,be,candidate,emergency,department,ED,authors,their,contributions,However,has,several,concerns,about,this,research
AB值：
0.502836
相似文献
机标中图分类号，由域田数据科技根据网络公开资料自动分析生成，仅供学习研究参考。
