FAILED
首站-论文投稿智能助手
典型文献
Comparing the Soil Conservation Service model with new machine learning algorithms for predicting cumulative infiltration in semi-arid regions
文献摘要:
Water infiltration into soil is an important process in hydrologic cycle;however, its measurement is difficult, time-consuming and costly. Empirical and physical models have been developed to predict cumulative infiltration (CI), but are often inaccurate. In this study, several novel standalone machine learning algorithms (M5Prime (M5P), decision stump (DS), and sequential minimal optimization (SMO)) and hybrid algorithms based on additive regression (AR) (i.e., AR-M5P, AR-DS, and AR-SMO) and weighted instance handler wrapper (WIHW) (i.e., WIHW-M5P, WIHW-DS, and WIHW-SMO) were developed for CI prediction. The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) model developed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), one of the most popular empirical models to predict CI, was considered as a benchmark. Overall, 154 measurements of CI (explanatory/input variables) were taken from 16 sites in a semi-arid region of Iran (Illam and Lorestan provinces). Six input variable combinations were considered based on Pearson correlations between candidate model inputs (time of measuring and soil bulk density, moisture content, and sand, clay, and silt percentages) and CI. The dataset was divided into two subgroups at random:70%of the data were used for model building (training dataset) and the remaining 30%were used for model validation (testing dataset). The various models were evaluated using different graphical approaches (bar charts, scatter plots, violin plots, and Taylor diagrams) and quantitative measures (root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and percent bias (PBIAS)). Time of measuring had the highest correlation with CI in the study area. The best input combinations were different for different algorithms. The results showed that all hybrid algorithms enhanced the CI prediction accuracy compared to the standalone models. The AR-M5P model provided the most accurate CI predictions (RMSE=0.75 cm, MAE=0.59 cm, NSE=0.98), while the SCS model had the lowest performance (RMSE=4.77 cm, MAE=2.64 cm, NSE=0.23). The differences in RMSE between the best model (AR-M5P) and the second-best (WIHW-M5P) and worst (SCS) were 40%and 84%, respectively.
文献关键词:
作者姓名:
Khabat KHOSRAVI;Phuong T.T.NGO;Rahim BARZEGAR;John QUILTY;Mohammad T.AALAMI;Dieu T.BUI
作者机构:
Department of Watershed Management Engineering,Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,Mashhad 93 Iran;Department of Earth and Environment,Florida International University,Miami 33199 USA;Institute of Research and Development,Duy Tan University,Da Nang 550000 Vietnam;Department of Bioresource Engineering,McGill University,Ste Anne de Bellevue QC H9X Canada;Faculty of Civil Engineering,University of Tabriz,Tabriz 51 Iran;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,University of Waterloo,Waterloo N2L 3G1 Canada;Department of Business and IT,University of South-Eastern Norway,Notodden 3603 Norway
引用格式:
[1]Khabat KHOSRAVI;Phuong T.T.NGO;Rahim BARZEGAR;John QUILTY;Mohammad T.AALAMI;Dieu T.BUI-.Comparing the Soil Conservation Service model with new machine learning algorithms for predicting cumulative infiltration in semi-arid regions)[J].土壤圈(英文版),2022(05):718-732
A类:
M5Prime,M5P,handler,wrapper,WIHW,Illam,Lorestan
B类:
Comparing,Soil,Conservation,Service,new,machine,learning,algorithms,predicting,cumulative,infiltration,semi,arid,regions,Water,into,soil,important,process,hydrologic,cycle,however,its,difficult,consuming,costly,Empirical,physical,models,have,been,developed,but,often,inaccurate,In,this,study,several,novel,standalone,decision,stump,DS,sequential,minimal,optimization,SMO,hybrid,additive,regression,weighted,instance,were,SCS,by,United,States,Department,Agriculture,USDA,most,popular,empirical,was,considered,benchmark,Overall,measurements,explanatory,variables,taken,from,sites,Iran,provinces,Six,combinations,correlations,between,candidate,inputs,measuring,bulk,density,moisture,content,sand,clay,silt,percentages,dataset,divided,two,subgroups,random,used,building,training,remaining,validation,testing,various,evaluated,using,different,graphical,approaches,bar,charts,scatter,plots,violin,Taylor,diagrams,quantitative,measures,root,mean,square,error,RMSE,absolute,MAE,Nash,Sutcliffe,efficiency,NSE,bias,PBIAS,Time,had,highest,area,best,results,showed,that,enhanced,accuracy,compared,provided,predictions,while,lowest,performance,differences,second,worst,respectively
AB值:
0.497737
相似文献
Response of soil respiration to environmental and photosynthetic factors in different subalpine forest?cover types in a loess alpine hilly region
Yuanhang Li;Sha Lin;Qi Chen;Xinyao Ma;Shuaijun Wang;Kangning He-School of Soil and Water Conservation,Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration On Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China;Beijing Engineering Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China;Engineering Research Center of Forestry Ecological Engineering,Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,People's Republic of China;North China Power Engineering Co.,Ltd.of China Power Engineering Consulting Group,Changchun 130021, People's Republic of China;Power China Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou 311122,People's Republic of China
Predictability performance enhancement for suspended sediment in rivers:Inspection of newly developed hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy system model
Rana Muhammad Adnan;Zaher Mundher Yaseen;Salim Heddam;Shamsuddin Shahid;Aboalghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki;Ozgur Kisi-State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering,Hohai University,Nanjing,210098,China;Department of Urban Planning,Engineering Networks and Systems,Institute of Architecture and Construction,South Ural State University,76,Lenin Prospect,454080 Chelyabinsk,Russia;New Era and Development in Civil Engineering Research Group,Scientific Research Center,Al-Ayen University,Thi-Qar,64001,Iraq;Faculty of Science,Agronomy Department,Hydraulics Division University,20 Ao(u)t 1955,Route El Hadaik,BP 26,Skikda,Algeria;School of Civil Engineering,Faculty of Engineering,Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM),Johor Bahru,81310,Malaysia;Geoinformation Tech.Center of Excellence,Faculty of Geomatics Engineering,K.N.Toosi University of Technology,Tehran,Iran;Department of Computer Science and Engineering,Sejong University,Seoul,Republic of Korea;Civil Engineering Department,Ilia State University,Tbilisi,Georgia,USA
机标中图分类号,由域田数据科技根据网络公开资料自动分析生成,仅供学习研究参考。