典型文献
Rail RCF damage quantification and comparison for different damage models
文献摘要:
There are several fatigue-based approaches that estimate the evolution of rolling contact fatigue(RCF)on rails over time and built to be used in tandem with multi-body simulations of vehicle dynamics.However,most of the models are not directly comparable with each other since they are based on different physical models even though they shall predict the same RCF damage at the end.This article studies different approaches to quantifying RCF and puts forward a measure for the degree of agree-ment between them.The methodological framework stud-ies various steps in the RCF quantification procedure within the context of one another,identifies the'primary quantification step'in each approach and compares results of the fatigue analyses.In addition to this,two quantities—'similarity'and'correlation'—have been put forward to give an indication of mutual agreement between models.Four widely used surface-based and sub-surface-based fatigue quantification approaches with varying complexi-ties have been studied.Different operational cases corre-sponding to a metro vehicle operation in Austria have been considered for this study.Results showed that the best possible quantity to compare is the normalized damage increment per loading cycle coming from different approaches.Amongst the methods studied,approaches that included the load distribution step on the contact patch showed higher similarity and correlation in their results.While the different approaches might qualitatively agree on whether contact cases are'damaging'due to RCF,they might not quantitatively correlate with the trends observed for damage increment values.
文献关键词:
中图分类号:
作者姓名:
Visakh V.Krishna;Saeed Hossein-Nia;Carlos Casanueva;Sebastian Stichel;Gerald Trummer;Klaus Six
作者机构:
Department of Engineering Mechanics,KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Stockholm,Sweden;Virtual Vehicle Research GmbH,Graz,Austria
文献出处:
引用格式:
[1]Visakh V.Krishna;Saeed Hossein-Nia;Carlos Casanueva;Sebastian Stichel;Gerald Trummer;Klaus Six-.Rail RCF damage quantification and comparison for different damage models)[J].铁道工程科学(英文),2022(01):23-40
A类:
complexi
B类:
Rail,RCF,damage,quantification,comparison,different,models,There,several,fatigue,approaches,that,estimate,evolution,rolling,contact,rails,over,built,used,tandem,multi,body,simulations,vehicle,dynamics,However,most,directly,comparable,each,since,they,physical,even,though,shall,predict,same,This,article,studies,quantifying,puts,forward,measure,degree,between,them,methodological,framework,various,steps,procedure,within,context,one,another,identifies,primary,compares,results,analyses,In,addition,this,two,quantities,similarity,correlation,have,been,give,indication,mutual,agreement,Four,widely,surface,sub,varying,studied,Different,operational,cases,sponding,metro,Austria,considered,study,Results,showed,best,possible,quantity,normalized,increment,loading,cycle,coming,from,Amongst,methods,included,distribution,patch,higher,their,While,might,qualitatively,whether,damaging,due,quantitatively,correlate,trends,observed,values
AB值:
0.527216
相似文献
机标中图分类号,由域田数据科技根据网络公开资料自动分析生成,仅供学习研究参考。