典型文献
Chinese herbal medicine and COVID-19: quality evaluation of clinical guidelines and expert consensus and analysis of key recommendations
文献摘要:
Objective: To systematically review the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), assess the methodological quality as well as clinical credibility and implementability of specific recommendations, and summarize key recommendations.Methods: As of April 2022, we conducted a comprehensive search on major electronic databases, guideline websites, academic society websites, and government websites to assess the methodological quality and clinical applicability of the included CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE)Ⅱ tool and Evaluation-Recommendations EXcellence (AGREE-REX) instructions, respectively. Results: The search yielded 61 CPGs, which were mostly published in 2020; moreover, 98.4% of the CPGs were published in China. Only five CPGs achieved a high-quality AGREE Ⅱ rating; further, six CPGs could be directly recommended, with most of the CPGs still showing much room for improvement. CPGs had a low overall score in the AGREE-REX evaluation, with the domains of clinical applicability, values and preferences, and implementability being standardized in 21.80% ± 12.56%, 16.00% ± 11.81%, and 31.33% ± 14.55% of the CPGs, respectively. Five high-quality CPGs mentioned 56 Chinese herbal formulas. Half of the recommendations had moderate or strong evidence level in the GRADE evaluation. The most frequently recommended herbal medicines were Lianhua Qingwen granule/capsule and Jinhua Qinggan granule; however, the strength of recommendation for each prescription varied across CPGs and populations. Conclusions: The overall quality of current CPGs for COVID-19 for CHM still needs to be improved; moreover, the strength of the evidence remains to be standardized across CPGs.
文献关键词:
中图分类号:
作者姓名:
Qingyong Zheng;Ya Gao;Lu Xiong;Hengyi Huang;Junfen Li;Guoyuan OuYang;Wulayin.Saimire;Jingjing Yang;Yu Zhang;Xiaopeng Wang;Xiaofeng Luo
作者机构:
School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,China;School of Nursing,Evidence-based Nursing Center,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,China;Department of Health Research Methods,Evidence,and Impact,McMaster University,Hamilton,Ontario,Canada;The First Clinical School of Medicine,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,China;The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,China
文献出处:
引用格式:
[1]Qingyong Zheng;Ya Gao;Lu Xiong;Hengyi Huang;Junfen Li;Guoyuan OuYang;Wulayin.Saimire;Jingjing Yang;Yu Zhang;Xiaopeng Wang;Xiaofeng Luo-.Chinese herbal medicine and COVID-19: quality evaluation of clinical guidelines and expert consensus and analysis of key recommendations)[J].针灸和草药(英文),2022(03):152-161
A类:
implementability,EXcellence
B类:
Chinese,herbal,quality,evaluation,clinical,guidelines,expert,consensus,analysis,key,recommendations,Objective,To,systematically,review,practice,CPGs,treatment,patients,coronavirus,disease,using,CHM,assess,methodological,well,credibility,specific,summarize,Methods,April,conducted,comprehensive,major,electronic,databases,websites,academic,society,government,applicability,included,Appraisal,Guidelines,Research,Evaluation,AGREE,tool,Recommendations,REX,instructions,respectively,Results,yielded,which,were,mostly,published,moreover,China,Only,five,achieved,high,rating,further,six,could,directly,recommended,still,showing,much,room,improvement,had,low,overall,score,domains,values,preferences,being,standardized,Five,mentioned,formulas,Half,moderate,strong,evidence,level,GRADE,frequently,medicines,Lianhua,Qingwen,granule,capsule,Jinhua,Qinggan,however,strength,each,prescription,varied,across,populations,Conclusions,current,needs,improved,remains
AB值:
0.492328
相似文献
机标中图分类号,由域田数据科技根据网络公开资料自动分析生成,仅供学习研究参考。