Cylindrical specimens are commonly used in Split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests to study the uniaxial dynamic properties of concrete-like materials.In recent years,true tri-axial SHPB equipment has also been developed or is under development to investigate the material dynamic properties under tri-axial impact loads.For such tests,cubic specimens are needed.It is well understood that static material strength obtained from cylinder and cube specimens are different.Conversion factors are obtained and adopted in some guidelines to convert the material strength obtained from the two types of specimens.Previous uniaxial impact tests have also demonstrated that the failure mode and the strain rate effect of cubic specimens are very different from that of cylindrical ones.However,the mechanical background of these findings is unclear.As an extension of the previous laboratory study,this study performs numerical SHPB tests of cubic and cylindrical concrete specimens subjected to uniaxial impact load with the validated numerical model.The stress states of cubic specimens in relation to its failure mode under different strain rates is analyzed and compared with cylindrical specimens.The detailed analyses of the numerical simulation results show that the lateral inertial confinement of the cylindrical specimen is higher than that of the cubic specimen under the same strain rates.For cubic specimen,the corners are more severely damaged because of the lower lateral confinement and the occurrence of the tensile radial stress which is not observed in cylindrical specimens.These results explain why the dynamic material strengths obtained from the two types of specimens are different and are strain rate dependent.Based on the simulation results,an empirical formula of conversion factor as a function of strain rate is proposed,which supplements the traditional conversion factor for quasi-static material strength.It can be used for transforming the dynamic compressive strength from cylinders to cubes obtained from impact tests at different strain rates.

Mei Li;Hong Hao;Jian Cui;Yi-fei Hao

Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education,Tianjin University,Tianjin,300072,China;School of Civil Engineering,Tianjin University,Tianjin,300072,China;Centre for Infrastructural Monitoring and Protection,School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering,Curtin University,Perth Western Australia,6845,Australia

防务技术

[1]Mei Li;Hong Hao;Jian Cui;Yi-fei Hao-.Numerical investigation of the failure mechanism of cubic concrete specimens in SHPB tests)[J].防务技术,2022(01):1-11

Numerical,investigation,failure,mechanism,cubic,concrete,specimens,SHPB,tests,Cylindrical,commonly,used,Split,Hopkinson,pressure,bar,study,uniaxial,dynamic,properties,like,materials,In,recent,years,true,tri,equipment,has,also,been,developed,development,investigate,impact,loads,For,such,needed,It,well,understood,that,static,obtained,from,different,Conversion,factors,adopted,some,guidelines,convert,two,types,Previous,have,demonstrated,strain,effect,very,cylindrical,ones,However,mechanical,background,these,findings,unclear,extension,previous,laboratory,this,performs,numerical,subjected,validated,model,stress,states,relation,its,rates,analyzed,compared,detailed,analyses,simulation,results,show,lateral,inertial,confinement,higher,than,same,corners,more,severely,damaged,because,lower,occurrence,tensile,radial,which,not,observed,These,explain,why,strengths,dependent,Based,empirical,formula,conversion,function,proposed,supplements,traditional,quasi,can,transforming,compressive,cylinders,cubes

0.444802